Franklin v. State

247 S.W.2d 562, 157 Tex. Crim. 177, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1731
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 9, 1952·No. 25802·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $300 and one hundred days in jail.

The information alleges that the sale was made to John Hynd in Fisher County, Texas, a dry area, and contains the additional and descriptive averment that the sale was "on the premises in the City of Rotan, Texas.”

Such descriptive averment was unnecessary to charge the offense but, having so alleged, the state assumed the burden of supporting that allegation by the proof.

We fail to find any testimony showing that the sale was made in the "City of Rotan, Texas.”

The evidence, in not establishing the allegations of the information, is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. State, 247 S.W.2d 562, 157 Tex. Crim. 177, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1731 (Tex. 1952).

247 S.W.2d 562 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
578 S.W.2d 411 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Cohen v. State
479 S.W.2d 950 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
McClure v. State
296 S.W.2d 263 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)
Ewing v. State
294 S.W.2d 107 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)