Franklin v. State
This text of 261 S.W.2d 324 (Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is forgery; the punishment, three years.
The state moves to dismiss the appeal, because no notice of appeal is shown to have been entered of record in the trial court. Such is requisite in order for this court to acquire jurisdiction. Ex parte Logan, 151 Tex. Cr. R. 129, 205 S. W. 2d 994.
The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
ON appellant’s motion to reinstate appeal.
Appellant moves to reinstate the appeal. He admits that no notice of appeal was entered of record, as required by the mandate of Art. 827, C. C. P., but insists that his release upon recognizance to abide the judgment of this court is tantamount to and should be construed as evidence that notice of appeal was given.
A proper notice of appeal is necessary to invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this court, and such requirement must be strictly complied with.
The motion to reinstate the appeal is overruled.
Opinion approved by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 S.W.2d 324, 159 Tex. Crim. 50, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-state-texcrimapp-1953.