Franklin v. State

306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, 2010 WL 933743

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Franklin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 153 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 16, 2010·No. No. ED 93029·Published

Opinion

[197]*197 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Franklin (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[197]*197 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Franklin (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Franklin v. State, 306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, 2010 WL 933743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

306 S.W.3d 196 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.