Franklin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Franklin v. State

306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, 2010 WL 933743

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketNo. ED 93029

StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 196 (Franklin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Franklin v. State, 306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, 2010 WL 933743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

[197]*197 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Franklin (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[197]*197 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Franklin (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his amended motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 196, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 310, 2010 WL 933743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-v-state-moctapp-2010.