Franklin v. State

933 So. 2d 577, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802, 2006 WL 1525882
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 6, 2006·No. No. 1D05-6173·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction or modification of sentence is directed to the discretion of the trial court and is not appealable. See Frazier v. State, 766 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

DISMISSED.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin v. State, 933 So. 2d 577, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8802, 2006 WL 1525882 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

933 So. 2d 577 (Franklin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Langford v. State
251 So. 3d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Priscilla Langford v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018