Franklin v. City of Kingsburg

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VERNON FRANKLIN, No. 1:18-cv-00824-SKO

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 CITY OF KINGSBURG, et al., (Doc. 85) 15 Defendant.

16 17 On May 14, 2025, the remaining parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action. 18 (Doc. 85.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 20 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 21

22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: May 15, 2025 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25

26 27 28