Franklin Finance Corp. v. Head
This text of 199 S.E. 59 (Franklin Finance Corp. v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. If, resolving all of the conflicts in favor of the plaintiff, a recovery would not be authorized, the judge may direct a verdict for the defendant.
2. The present ease is in principle controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court in Parsons v. Fox, 179 Ga. 605 (176 S. E. 642); Jackson v. Bloodworth, 41 Ga. App. 216 (152 S. E. 289) ; Hinton v. Mack Purchasing Co., 41 Ga. App. 823 (155 S. E. 78); Portwood v. Bennett Trading Co., 184 Ga. 617 (192 S. E. 217); Hanes v. Henderson, 58 Ga. App. 475, supra. We can add nothing to what has been said in those decisions on the subject. The trial judge was correct in directing the verdict, and the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 S.E. 59, 58 Ga. App. 475, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-finance-corp-v-head-gactapp-1938.