Franklin Finance Corp. v. Head

199 S.E. 59, 58 Ga. App. 475, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 16
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 5, 1938·No. 26996·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Guerry, J.

1. If, resolving all of the conflicts in favor of the plaintiff, a recovery would not be authorized, the judge may direct a verdict for the defendant.

2. The present ease is in principle controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court and of this court in Parsons v. Fox, 179 Ga. 605 (176 S. E. 642); Jackson v. Bloodworth, 41 Ga. App. 216 (152 S. E. 289) ; Hinton v. Mack Purchasing Co., 41 Ga. App. 823 (155 S. E. 78); Portwood v. Bennett Trading Co., 184 Ga. 617 (192 S. E. 217); Hanes v. Henderson, 58 Ga. App. 475, supra. We can add nothing to what has been said in those decisions on the subject. The trial judge was correct in directing the verdict, and the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur. Bon K. Johnston, for plaintiff. Victor K. Meador, J. L. B. Boyd, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin Finance Corp. v. Head, 199 S.E. 59, 58 Ga. App. 475, 1938 Ga. App. LEXIS 16 (Ga. Ct. App. 1938).

199 S.E. 59 (Franklin Finance Corp. v. Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Associated Food Stores, Inc.
165 S.E.2d 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Gunnels v. Atlanta Bar Ass'n
191 Ga. 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Gunnels v. Atlanta Bar Association
12 S.E.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Atlanta Finance Co. v. Fitzgerald
8 S.E.2d 105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
In re Taylor
29 F. Supp. 656 (N.D. Georgia, 1939)