Franklin County, Georgia v. United States

341 F.2d 106, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6683
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 1965
Docket21230_1
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 341 F.2d 106 (Franklin County, Georgia v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Franklin County, Georgia v. United States, 341 F.2d 106, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6683 (5th Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The road and bridge for which the commissioners awarded only nominal damages in this case were condemned in connection with the Hartwell Dam and Reservoir project. The bridge spanned Eastanollee Creek in Franklin County, Georgia; the road involved was 2,000 feet in length and joined the bridge at each end.

No prejudicial error appears in either the appointment of or the instructions to the commissioners, nor in the award itself. Any error in the District Court’s instruction that fair market value was the proper measure of compensation, rather than the value of substitute facilities, see City of Fort Worth, Texas v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 188 F.2d 217; and State of Washington v. United States, 9 Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 33, was rendered harmless by appellant’s request before the commissioners for the substitute facilities measure, and by the application of that measure by the commissioners.

*107 The appointment of commissioners by the court, although both parties had previously requested a jqry trial, was justified by the character and location of the property condemned and by the necessity of inspecting the area as to which a need for substitute facilities was claimed. It affirmatively appears from the record that the commissioners surveyed the area affected before and after the taking. Moreover, the record warrants the conclusion that substitute facilities were unnecessary, and thus that appellant was entitled to nominal damages only.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Lakewood v. Pierce County
6 P.3d 1184 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Prince William County Service Authority v. United States
25 Cl. Ct. 678 (Court of Claims, 1992)
United States v. Streets
531 F.2d 882 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Streets, Alleys & Public Ways
531 F.2d 882 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
State v. Township of South Hackensack
269 A.2d 769 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
County of Sarpy, Nebraska v. The United States
386 F.2d 453 (Court of Claims, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 F.2d 106, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-county-georgia-v-united-states-ca5-1965.