Franken v. Commissioner
This text of 24 B.T.A. 39 (Franken v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[40]*40OPINION.
The identical question raised in these proceedings as to the compensation received by each of the petitioners for legal services rendered to the Norborne Land Drainage District Company has been decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Burnet v. Jones, 50 Fed. (2d) 14, where the compensation received by S. J. J ones, who was also one of the attorneys for such company, was held to be taxable. A similar question is presented as to the compensation received by each of the petitioners for legal services rendered to the Egypt-Prairie Drainage District, under a contract of employment almost identical in its terms with the Norborne contract. Upon authority of the Jones case, sufra, which we think is controlling as to both items of income, the respondent’s determination is approved.
As to the compensation of $100 received by each of the petitioners for legal services rendered to the city of Norborne, Mo., the record is insufficient for us to determine whether the petitioners were employees of the city, in accordance with our holding in W. B. Matthews, 13 B. T. A. 1133, or independent contractors. We must, therefore, approve the determination of the respondent.
Decision will be entered for the respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 B.T.A. 39, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franken-v-commissioner-bta-1931.