Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 03-14-00621-CV May 29, 2015
Frank M. Selieer IN THE COURT OF APPEALS PLAINTIFF
vs.
Ethiopian Evangelical Church DEFENDANT THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE: THAT THE COURT GRANT A 30 DAY CONTINANCE—FOR THE APPELLANT'S REPLY TO THE APPELLEE'S BRIEF
The Plaintiff in the case listed above requests a 30 extension of the due date for the Appellant's Brief.
The Plaintiff needs to confer with a source who is currently out of town.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
5-29-2015
FENDANT
Certificate of Service
I certify that a complete copy of this document was delivered to the Defendant's attorney... by certified mail.
S/z^/zo/^
Date: 5-29-2015
Certificate of Conference
As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify that I have conferred with the appropriate party on the merits of this motion with the following results:
The Plaintiff conferred by phone with opposing counsel- concerning the above Motion and email." They stated... "We have no objection
/'RECEIVEDN, MAY 2 9 2015 ^THIRDCOURTOF APPEALS. \ JEFFREY P.KYLE /
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church (Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.