Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 11, 2015·No. 03-14-00621-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS CAUSE NO. 03-14-00621-CV February 11, 2015

Frank M. Seliper IN THE COURT OF APPEALS PLAINTIFF

vs.

Ethiopian Evangelical Church DEFENDANT THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE: THAT THE COURT GRANT A 30 DAY CONTINANCE—FOR THE APPELLANT'S BRIEF—CURRENTLY DUE ON FEBRUARY 4th, 2015

The Plaintiff in the case listed above requests a 30-day extension of the due date for the Appellant's Brief for the following reason:

The Plaintiff is consulting with a person with legal expertise in the current appeal. That person has had a family issue - andwill not be available for about 3 weeks. The 30-day extension will be sufficient time to allow for resolution of the family issue and the completion of the Appellant's Brief to be filed.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

o-se

NTED NAMEW DEFENDANT PRINTED

Certificate of Service

I certify that a complete copy of this document was delivered tothe Defendant's attorney... by certified mail.

/'RECEIVED ^ z/7&/^fi/<r-

FEB 112015

&

THIRD COURT CF APPEALS/ V -IFFFREY D. KYIE ./ Certificate of Conference

As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), I certify that 1have conferred with theappropriate party on the merits of this motion with the following results:

On the 30™ Day ofJanuary 2015, the Plaintiff conferred by phone with opposing counsel- concerning the above Motion, he stated that he was opposed. He did not give any reason «as to why he opposed the motion.

1r

(VI

»

83

-n & . m # •

I (a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church (Frank M. Seliger v. Ethiopian Evangelical Church) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.