Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company

327 F.2d 637
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 1964
Docket9210
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 327 F.2d 637 (Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company, 327 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the District Court that a private automobile being driven from the place of business of the owner by a garage keeper to his garage for the purpose of effecting repairs requested by the owner was not being “used in the automobile business” within the meaning of an exclusion clause in the owner’s liability insurance policy.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MFA Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
595 S.W.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1980)
Grahame v. Mitchell
329 N.E.2d 17 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Kravis v. Smith-Marine, Inc.
314 N.E.2d 577 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Verhulst
471 S.W.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1971)
Christensen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
443 P.2d 385 (Utah Supreme Court, 1968)
Donald Helmich v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.
376 F.2d 420 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
327 F.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-h-goforth-v-allstate-insurance-company-ca4-1964.