Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company
327 F.2d 637
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1964·No. 9210·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
We agree with the District Court that a private automobile being driven from the place of business of the owner by a garage keeper to his garage for the purpose of effecting repairs requested by the owner was not being “used in the automobile business” within the meaning of an exclusion clause in the owner’s liability insurance policy.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company, 327 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1964).
327 F.2d 637 (Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MFA Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
595 S.W.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1980)
Grahame v. Mitchell
329 N.E.2d 17 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1975)
Kravis v. Smith-Marine, Inc.
314 N.E.2d 577 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)
Continental National American Group v. Allied Mutual Insurance
506 P.2d 478 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1973)
Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Verhulst
471 S.W.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1971)
Christensen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
443 P.2d 385 (Utah Supreme Court, 1968)
Donald Helmich v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.
376 F.2d 420 (Seventh Circuit, 1967)