A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert

Fifth Circuit

A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert

327 F.2d 637

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 3, 1964·No. 20494·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an interlocutory decree holding respondent, Glittre, solely responsible for the damages sustained by the trawler Sea Queen and personal injuries to its captain and co-owner, Fontenot, presents only factual issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and may not be reversed by this Court on appeal. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an interlocutory decree holding respondent, Glittre, solely responsible for the damages sustained by the trawler Sea Queen and personal injuries to its captain and co-owner, Fontenot, presents only factual issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and may not be reversed by this Court on appeal. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert, 327 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

327 F.2d 637 (A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related