A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert

Fifth Circuit

A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert

327 F.2d 637

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1964

Docket20494

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 327 F.2d 637 (A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A/s Glittre v. Amos Fontenot and A. Joubert, 327 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an interlocutory decree holding respondent, Glittre, solely responsible for the damages sustained by the trawler Sea Queen and personal injuries to its captain and co-owner, Fontenot, presents only factual issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and may not be reversed by this Court on appeal. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an interlocutory decree holding respondent, Glittre, solely responsible for the damages sustained by the trawler Sea Queen and personal injuries to its captain and co-owner, Fontenot, presents only factual issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and may not be reversed by this Court on appeal. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6, 99 L.Ed. 20.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 F.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/as-glittre-v-amos-fontenot-and-a-joubert-ca5-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack