Frank B. Hall & Co. of New York, Inc. v. Orient Overseas Associates

401 N.E.2d 189, 48 N.Y.2d 958, 425 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2555
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 17, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 401 N.E.2d 189 (Frank B. Hall & Co. of New York, Inc. v. Orient Overseas Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank B. Hall & Co. of New York, Inc. v. Orient Overseas Associates, 401 N.E.2d 189, 48 N.Y.2d 958, 425 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2555 (N.Y. 1979).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Article 61(b) of the lease relates tax escalation to "the issuance of a temporary or permanent Certificate of Occupancy for the Building of which the demised premises are a part and which Certificate permits Tenant to enter into occupancy of the demised premises”. Article 36 on the other hand explicitly refers the commencement of rent to the time when "a Certificate of Occupancy (temporary or final) has been issued by the Department of Buildings of the City of New York, permitting Tenant’s use of the demised premises for the purposes for which the same have been leased” (emphasis supplied). The lease contemplated a good deal of tenant’s work in the premises between "occupancy” under article 61(b) and "use * * * for the purposes for which * * * leased” under article 36. The difference in the language of the two provisions, by which the parties must be deemed to have intended different meanings, makes clear that all that was required to trigger the tax escalation provision of article 61(b) was the issuance of a temporary certificate of occupancy. Since that occurred on December 23, 1971 that is the base date for tax escalation purposes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frederick J. Platek v. Town of Hamberg / Allstate Indemnity Company
26 N.E.3d 1167 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
NFL Enterprises LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
51 A.D.3d 52 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Cushman & Wakefield Inc. v. 214 East 49th Street Corp.
218 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Onorato v. Onorato
133 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Mandel v. 201 West 16 Associates
121 A.D.2d 910 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Goodstein Construction Corp. v. City of New York
111 A.D.2d 49 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Slatt v. Slatt
477 N.E.2d 1099 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Slatt v. Slatt
102 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
General Instrument Corp. v. Consolidated Edison Co.
99 A.D.2d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
In Re Evelyn Byrnes, Inc.
32 B.R. 825 (S.D. New York, 1983)
Leighton's Inc. v. Century Circuit, Inc.
95 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Frank B. Hall & Co. of New York, Inc. v. Orient Overseas Associates
84 A.D.2d 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
J. C. Penney Co. v. 1700 Broadway Co.
104 Misc. 2d 787 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Frank B. Hall & Co. of New York, Inc. v. Orient Overseas Associates
401 N.E.2d 189 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 N.E.2d 189, 48 N.Y.2d 958, 425 N.Y.S.2d 66, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-b-hall-co-of-new-york-inc-v-orient-overseas-associates-ny-1979.