Francisco Bahena Rosas v. Eric Holder, Jr.

411 F. App'x 970
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2011
Docket09-70914
StatusUnpublished

This text of 411 F. App'x 970 (Francisco Bahena Rosas v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Francisco Bahena Rosas v. Eric Holder, Jr., 411 F. App'x 970 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Bahena Rosas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that Bahena Rosas lacks the good moral character required for cancellation of removal. See Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir.2005) (good moral character determination is reviewable only where it is based on one of the statutory per se exclusions found in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)), overruled on other grounds by Sanchez v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1028, 1031-34 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Bahena Rosas’ contentions that the IJ was biased and mischaracterized the evidence against him because Bahena Rosas failed to exhaust these issues before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004); see also Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779-80 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED,

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 F. App'x 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francisco-bahena-rosas-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.