Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Francis v. State

Francis v. State

109 S.W.2d 481, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 714
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Francis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 591 →
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 13, 1937·No. No. 18793·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

On July 3, 1937, which was after this court had adjourned for the term, there was lodged with the clerk the appellant’s application for leave to file a second motion for rehearing. The decisions are unanimous to the effect that second motions for rehearing filed after adjournment cannot be considered by the appellate court. See Silver v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.App. 512, 8 S.W. (2d) 144, 9 S.W. (2d) 358, 60 A.L.R. 290; [482]*482Burleson v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.App. 76, 96 S.W.(2d) 785; Secrist v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.App. 182, 97 S.W.(2d) 196; McNeese v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.App. 421, 52 S.W.(2d) 1049; Ortiz v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.App. 438, 53 S.W.(2d) 58.

The application'for leave to file.the second motion for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis v. State, 109 S.W.2d 481, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 714 (Tex. 1937).

109 S.W.2d 481 (Francis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Secrist v. State
97 S.W.2d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Curg Burleson v. State
96 S.W.2d 785 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
McNeese v. State
52 S.W.2d 1049 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Ortiz v. State
53 S.W.2d 58 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Silver v. State
8 S.W.2d 144 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Silver v. State
9 S.W.2d 358 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)