Francis v. State
76 S.W.2d 1110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Francis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 Tex. Crim. 591 →
Opinion
Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.
Under the holding in Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882, and Hilterbrand v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 884, the indictment in the present case is fatally defective.
The judgment is reversed, arid the prosecution ordered dismissed under the present indictment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Francis v. State, 76 S.W.2d 1110 (Tex. 1934).
76 S.W.2d 1110 (Francis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Offield v. State
75 S.W.2d 882 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Hilterbrand v. State
75 S.W.2d 884 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)