Fraley v. Muller

281 A.D. 1016, 121 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4118
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 12, 1953·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Whether the father of the decedent son is entitled to share in the death action depends on whether he had voluntarily abandoned or failed to support his family within the meaning of subdivision 2 of section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law. Since the death was in 1948, the amendment of 1949 to section 133, providing for distribution in proportion to pecuniary injuries suffered does not apply to this case. There is an issue between the mother and-father whether the separation between them was due to the father’s illness, or to an abandonment and that issue should be examined. Order unanimously reversed and the matter remitted to Special Term for a hearing on that issue, with costs to abide the event. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fraley v. Muller, 281 A.D. 1016, 121 N.Y.S.2d 138, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 1016 (Fraley v. Muller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Estate of Parsons
272 N.W.2d 16 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1978)
Dance v. Martelli
147 N.E.2d 385 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1958)
In re the Accounting of Guilianelli
7 Misc. 2d 171 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)