Fox v. State
802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 38, 2002 WL 10517
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 14568 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA), reh’g denied and certifying questions in, 786 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 797 So.2d 585 (Fla.2001); Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). See also Headley v. State, 770 So.2d 1244 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(holding that the Criminal Punishment Code is not facially unconstitutional); Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (same); Hayes v. State, 780 So.2d 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (same); Cramer v. State, 776 So.2d 1125 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fox v. State, 802 So. 2d 1199, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 38, 2002 WL 10517 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
802 So. 2d 1199 (Fox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harvey v. State
786 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hall v. State
773 So. 2d 99 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Hayes v. State
780 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Headley v. State
770 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Cramer v. State
776 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)