Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cramer v. State

Cramer v. State

776 So. 2d 1125, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 2001 WL 111167
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 2001
DocketNo. 1D99-4360
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 776 So. 2d 1125 (Cramer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cramer v. State, 776 So. 2d 1125, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 2001 WL 111167 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea of nolo con-tendere, Appellant Robert Cramer received the minimum prison sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet in the record. At the sentencing hearing Cramer preserved no error. Nevertheless, appellant’s counsel has filed a brief contending that the Criminal Punishment Code is unconstitutional on various grounds. This argument is without merit. See Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Hayes v. State, Case No. 99-2437, — So.2d -, [1126]*11262001 WL 20794 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 10, 2001).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fox v. State
802 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Dowdy v. State
795 So. 2d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
776 So. 2d 1125, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 2001 WL 111167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.