Cramer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cramer v. State

776 So. 2d 1125, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 2001 WL 111167

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 2001·No. No. 1D99-4360·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea of nolo con-tendere, Appellant Robert Cramer received the minimum prison sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet in the record. At the sentencing hearing Cramer preserved no error. Nevertheless, appellant’s counsel has filed a brief contending that the Criminal Punishment Code is unconstitutional on various grounds. This argument is without merit. See Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Hayes v. State, Case No. 99-2437, — So.2d -, [1126] 2001 WL 20794 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 10, 2001).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea of nolo con-tendere, Appellant Robert Cramer received the minimum prison sentence under the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet in the record. At the sentencing hearing Cramer preserved no error. Nevertheless, appellant’s counsel has filed a brief contending that the Criminal Punishment Code is unconstitutional on various grounds. This argument is without merit. See Hall v. State, 773 So.2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); see also Hayes v. State, Case No. 99-2437, — So.2d -, [1126] 2001 WL 20794 (Fla. 1st DCA Jan. 10, 2001).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ, concur.

Cramer v. State, 776 So. 2d 1125, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1224, 2001 WL 111167 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

776 So. 2d 1125 (Cramer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related