Fox v. Drew

470 F. App'x 148
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fox v. Drew. Read the opinion of the Court — 563 F. App'x 279
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2012·No. No. 11-7659·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2011) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fox v. Warden Drew, No. 8:11-cv-01470-TMC, 2011 WL 5403593 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Drew, 470 F. App'x 148 (4th Cir. 2012).

470 F. App'x 148 (Fox v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241