Fox v. Drew

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 21, 2010·No. 09-7578·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7578

CLARENCE T. FOX, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DARLENE DREW, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (2:09-cv-01868-HFF)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence T. Fox, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Fox v. Drew, No. 2:09-cv-01868-HFF

(D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Drew, (4th Cir. 2010).

Fox v. Drew (Fox v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241