Fowler. v. Geithner

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fowler. v. Geithner. Read the opinion of the Court — 417 F. App'x 279
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2011·No. 10-2338·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2338

GERRY W. FOWLER, SR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00225-JBF-DEM)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gerry W. Fowler, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gerry W. Fowler, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order granting Secretary Geithner’s motion to dismiss Fowler’s

action for failure to state a claim for relief. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Fowler v. Geithner, No. 2:09-cv-00225-JBF-DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 4,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fowler. v. Geithner, (4th Cir. 2011).

Fowler. v. Geithner (Fowler. v. Geithner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.