Fowler. v. Geithner
This text of Fowler. v. Geithner (Fowler. v. Geithner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2338
GERRY W. FOWLER, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00225-JBF-DEM)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerry W. Fowler, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gerry W. Fowler, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order granting Secretary Geithner’s motion to dismiss Fowler’s
action for failure to state a claim for relief. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Fowler v. Geithner, No. 2:09-cv-00225-JBF-DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 4,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fowler. v. Geithner, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-v-geithner-ca4-2011.