Fowler-Flemister Coal Co. v. Evans

92 S.E. 1010, 20 Ga. App. 200, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 806
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1917·No. 8160·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The court did not err in refusing to permit the defendant’s witness to answer the following question: “That cupping or pulling apart was not the result of any negligence on your part;” the court stating that the witness could testify to the facts, but could not testify to his conclusion that his conduct was or was not negligent.

2. When the charge of the court is considered as a whole, the instructions complained of are not subject, to the criticisms urged in the motion for a new trial. The charge was full and fair.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, G. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fowler-Flemister Coal Co. v. Evans, 92 S.E. 1010, 20 Ga. App. 200, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 806 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

92 S.E. 1010 (Fowler-Flemister Coal Co. v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fishman v. State
197 S.E.2d 467 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Cone v. Davis
17 S.E.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)