Fowler-Flemister Coal Co. v. Evans
This text of 92 S.E. 1010 (Fowler-Flemister Coal Co. v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in refusing to permit the defendant’s witness to answer the following question: “That cupping or pulling apart was not the result of any negligence on your part;” the court stating that the witness could testify to the facts, but could not testify to his conclusion that his conduct was or was not negligent.
2. When the charge of the court is considered as a whole, the instructions complained of are not subject, to the criticisms urged in the motion for a new trial. The charge was full and fair.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 1010, 20 Ga. App. 200, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fowler-flemister-coal-co-v-evans-gactapp-1917.