Fouche v. Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.

217 So. 3d 225, 2017 WL 1423547, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 2017
DocketCase 5D16-848
StatusPublished

This text of 217 So. 3d 225 (Fouche v. Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fouche v. Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc., 217 So. 3d 225, 2017 WL 1423547, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PALMER, J.

Suzanne Fouche appeals the order entered by the trial court enforcing this court’s mandate which directed the court to send this matter to arbitration. 1 We reverse the trial court’s order dismissing, rather than staying, Fourche’s lawsuit pending arbitration. We otherwise affirm.

In the previous appeal, we reversed the trial court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration filed by appellee, Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. We remanded the matter to the trial court with instruc *226 tions to submit the case to arbitration. On remand, Fouche filed a motion for entry of an order on remand. After a hearing, the trial court entered an order submitting the case to arbitration and dismissing Fouche’s lawsuit without prejudice. Fouche contends that the trial court erred in dismissing, rather than staying, her lawsuit. We agree.

Pursuant to section 682.03 of the Florida Statutes, the imposition of a stay, not an order of dismissal, is the appropriate disposition when a matter is sent to arbitration. The statute reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

682.03. Proceedings to compel and to stay arbitration
(7) If the court orders arbitration, the court on just terms shall stay any judicial proceeding that involves a claim subject to the arbitration.

§ 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2015). Our court recently recognized the appropriate disposition under facts similar to the instant case. In Timber Pines Plaza, LLC v. Zabrzyski, No. 5D16-3275, 211 So.3d 1147, 2017 WL 951869 (Fla. 5th DCA March 10, 2017), we reversed the trial court’s order denying a motion to compel arbitration and remanded with instructions to send the matter to arbitration and to stay the litigation, citing to section 682.03(7).

Accordingly, the trial court’s order is reversed in part and this matter is remanded with instructions to vacate the dismissal language and to impose a stay of the instant lawsuit. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
1

. Pilot Catastrophe Servs., Inc. v. Fouche, 145 So.3d 151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Timber Pines Plaza, LLC v. Zabrzyski
211 So. 3d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. v. Fouche
145 So. 3d 151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 So. 3d 225, 2017 WL 1423547, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fouche-v-pilot-catastrophe-services-inc-fladistctapp-2017.