Foster v. Woods

16 Mass. 116
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 16 Mass. 116 (Foster v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Woods, 16 Mass. 116 (Mass. 1819).

Opinion

Curia.

The motion to set aside the nonsuit is overruled. The exception from the operation of the covenants in the deed'is of all mortgages made by Ezra Pepper in his lifetime. The reference to the record may be considered as descriptive, or as an affirmation that all the mortgages were recorded. The deed to Ezra Pepper, jun., Oeing then on record, and the bond of defeasance not being required at that period to be recorded, it was at least ambiguous, whether ihat deed was not considered by the parties as one of the mortgages recorded. And this, we think, lets in the paroi evidence, by which it is clear that this is one of the mortgages intended to be excepted from the covenants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berg v. Erickson
234 F. 817 (Eighth Circuit, 1916)
State Historical Ass'n v. Silverman
65 S.E. 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Stoops v. Smith
100 Mass. 63 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Neederer v. Barber
17 F. Cas. 1273 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1843)
Hall v. Rand
8 Conn. 560 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Mass. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-woods-mass-1819.