Foster v. Woods

16 Mass. 116
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1819·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Curia.

The motion to set aside the nonsuit is overruled. The exception from the operation of the covenants in the deed'is of all mortgages made by Ezra Pepper in his lifetime. The reference to the record may be considered as descriptive, or as an affirmation that all the mortgages were recorded. The deed to Ezra Pepper, jun., Oeing then on record, and the bond of defeasance not being required at that period to be recorded, it was at least ambiguous, whether ihat deed was not considered by the parties as one of the mortgages recorded. And this, we think, lets in the paroi evidence, by which it is clear that this is one of the mortgages intended to be excepted from the covenants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Woods, 16 Mass. 116 (Mass. 1819).

16 Mass. 116 (Foster v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Berg v. Erickson
234 F. 817 (Eighth Circuit, 1916)
State Historical Ass'n v. Silverman
65 S.E. 293 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Stoops v. Smith
100 Mass. 63 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1868)
Neederer v. Barber
17 F. Cas. 1273 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1843)
Hall v. Rand
8 Conn. 560 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)