Foster v. United States

667 F. App'x 808
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2016·No. No. 16-6572·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Doris Denise Foster appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Foster, No. 1:09-cr-00013-MR-DLH-7 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. United States, 667 F. App'x 808 (4th Cir. 2016).

667 F. App'x 808 (Foster v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related