Foster v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Foster v. United States

63 F. App'x 776

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2003·No. No. 03-6528·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Michael Foster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Foster, Nos. CR-01-44; CA-02-1346-2 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Michael Foster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000) motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Foster, Nos. CR-01-44; CA-02-1346-2 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Foster v. United States, 63 F. App'x 776 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

63 F. App'x 776 (Foster v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related