Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corporation

Opinion

Case: 13-1374 Document: 42 Page: 1 Filed: 10/03/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________

FREDERICK FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PITNEY BOWES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, AND

JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. __________________________

2013-1374 __________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 11-CV-7303, Judge Joel H. Slomsky. __________________________

ON MOTION __________________________

PER CURIAM. Case: 13-1374 Document: 42 Page: 2 Filed: 10/03/2013

FOSTER v. PITNEY BOWES CORPORATION 2

ORDER Frederick Foster has filed a motion for “judicial notice of new evidence pursuant to F.R.Evid. 201(c) and interven- ing change of controlling law/correction of error pursuant to F.R.C.P. 59(e).” Pitney Bowes Corporation and the United States Postal Service oppose. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions are deferred for consideration by the mer- its panel. A copy of the motions papers and this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to the case.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s26