Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJuly 2, 2013
Docket13-1374
StatusUnpublished

This text of Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corporation (Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Case: 13-1374 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 07/02/2013

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________

FREDERICK FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PITNEY BOWES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee, AND

JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. __________________________

2013-1374, -1444 __________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 11-CV-7303, Judge Joel H. Slomsky. __________________________

ON MOTION __________________________

PER CURIAM. Case: 13-1374 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 07/02/2013

FOSTER v. PITNEY BOWES CORPORATION 2

ORDER Frederick Foster moves to revise the official caption in appeal No. 2013-1374 to include the United States Postal Service (USPS) as an appellee. The USPS opposes being added as a defendant-appellee and asks the court to strike portions of Foster’s brief or in the alternative to be given leave to file a response to his brief. Recently docketed appeal No. 2013-1444 involves the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s July 23, 2012 order granting dismissal of the USPS as a defendant and subsequent denial of Foster’s motion for sanctions against the USPS. That appeal, which is consolidated with appeal No. 2013-1374, moots the arguments made by the USPS. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Foster’s motion is granted to the extent that the USPS is added as a defendant-appellee. (2) The revised official caption is reflected above. (3) Appellees should compute the due date of their briefs from the date of this order.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-pitney-bowes-corporation-cafc-2013.