Foster v. Marshall
343 So. 2d 1067
Opinion
Rev. Aubrey Denson FOSTER et al.
v.
Billy R. MARSHALL et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ refused. On the facts found by the court of appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
DENNIS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Foster v. Marshall, 343 So. 2d 1067 (La. 1977).
343 So. 2d 1067 (Foster v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sawyer v. NIAGARA MACH. AND TOOL WORKS, INC.
535 So. 2d 1057 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)
Jurovich v. Catalanotto
506 So. 2d 662 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Norris v. Bell Helicopter Textron
495 So. 2d 976 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Otis Scott v. White Trucks, and Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Intervenor-Appellant
699 F.2d 714 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Savage v. Jacobsen Mfg. Co.
396 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Lillie Mae Lebouef v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Travelers Insurance Company v. Ford Motor Company
623 F.2d 985 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
Marceleno v. State, Dept. of Highways
367 So. 2d 882 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)
Tri-State Etc. v. Fid. & Cas. Ins. Etc.
364 So. 2d 657 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
Daniels v. Albach Co., Inc.
365 So. 2d 898 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
Tri-State Insurance Co. of Tulsa v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N. Y.
364 So. 2d 657 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)