Home/Eleventh Circuit/Foster v. Jesup

Foster v. Jesup

782 F.2d 901, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 1986
DocketNos. 83-7573, 84-7255
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 782 F.2d 901 (Foster v. Jesup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Jesup, 782 F.2d 901, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943 (11th Cir. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In light of the answers to certified questions by the Supreme Court of Alabama, [902]*902482 So.2d 1201 (Ala.1986), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. With respect to Foster’s claim that the district court erred in its award of attorney’s fees, we conclude that there is no error. Foster is entitled to attorney’s fees on this appeal, the amount to be determined by the district court. Costs on appeal shall be borne by Jesup and Lamont.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,392 J. Don Foster, an Individual, Cross-Appellant v. Jesup and Lamont Securities Co., Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Appellee. J. Don Foster, an Individual, Cross-Appellee v. Texas Partners '80 Ltd., a Limited Partnership, Minnick Resources Management, Inc., a Corporation, F. Wendell Minnick, an Individual, Jesup and Lamont Securities Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Pyron Exploration and Drilling Corp., a Corporation, Cross-Appellants
782 F.2d 901 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
782 F.2d 901, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-jesup-ca11-1986.