Home/Eleventh Circuit/Foster v. Jesup

Foster v. Jesup

782 F.2d 901, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 4, 1986·No. Nos. 83-7573, 84-7255·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In light of the answers to certified questions by the Supreme Court of Alabama, [902]*902482 So.2d 1201 (Ala.1986), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. With respect to Foster’s claim that the district court erred in its award of attorney’s fees, we conclude that there is no error. Foster is entitled to attorney’s fees on this appeal, the amount to be determined by the district court. Costs on appeal shall be borne by Jesup and Lamont.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foster v. Jesup, 782 F.2d 901, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21943 (11th Cir. 1986).

782 F.2d 901 (Foster v. Jesup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,392 J. Don Foster, an Individual, Cross-Appellant v. Jesup and Lamont Securities Co., Inc., a Corporation, Cross-Appellee. J. Don Foster, an Individual, Cross-Appellee v. Texas Partners '80 Ltd., a Limited Partnership, Minnick Resources Management, Inc., a Corporation, F. Wendell Minnick, an Individual, Jesup and Lamont Securities Co., Inc., a Corporation, and Pyron Exploration and Drilling Corp., a Corporation, Cross-Appellants
782 F.2d 901 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)