Foster v. Drew

Fourth Circuit

Foster v. Drew

360 F. App'x 446

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2010·No. No. 09-6708·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby O. Foster, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foster v. Drew, No. 3:09-cv-00118-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [447]*447materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby O. Foster, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foster v. Drew, No. 3:09-cv-00118-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [447]*447materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Foster v. Drew, 360 F. App'x 446 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

360 F. App'x 446 (Foster v. Drew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related