Foster v. Boulo
This text of 176 F. 1022 (Foster v. Boulo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
With all the evidence offered by the plaintiff below admitted, we are of opinion' that it is insufficient to establish title to the lot in controversy. Besides, see Boulo v. N. O., M. & T. R. R., 55 Ala. 480-493. But, however this may be; the plaintiff’s-claim is barred by the statute of limitations of the state of Alabama, as construed by the Supreme Court of that state. See Woodstock Iron Co. v. Fullenwider, 87 Ala. 584, 6 South. 197, 13 Am. St. Rep. 73; Lowery v. Davis (Ala.) 8 South. 79. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 F. 1022, 100 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-boulo-ca5-1910.