Foster v. Boulo

176 F. 1022, 100 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4323
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 1910
DocketNo. 2,009
StatusPublished

This text of 176 F. 1022 (Foster v. Boulo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foster v. Boulo, 176 F. 1022, 100 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4323 (5th Cir. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

With all the evidence offered by the plaintiff below admitted, we are of opinion' that it is insufficient to establish title to the lot in controversy. Besides, see Boulo v. N. O., M. & T. R. R., 55 Ala. 480-493. But, however this may be; the plaintiff’s-claim is barred by the statute of limitations of the state of Alabama, as construed by the Supreme Court of that state. See Woodstock Iron Co. v. Fullenwider, 87 Ala. 584, 6 South. 197, 13 Am. St. Rep. 73; Lowery v. Davis (Ala.) 8 South. 79. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boulo v. New Orleans, Mobile & Texas Railroad
55 Ala. 480 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Woodstock Iron Co. v. Fullenwider
87 Ala. 584 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 F. 1022, 100 C.C.A. 665, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foster-v-boulo-ca5-1910.