Fortec Constructors, Etc. v. The United States
This text of 804 F.2d 141 (Fortec Constructors, Etc. v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
804 F.2d 141
FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, etc., et al., Appellees,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Appellant.
Appeal No. 86-960.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Oct. 31, 1986.
Joseph T. Casey, Jr., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. James R. Thornton, Jr., Dept. of the Army, Savannah, Georgia, of counsel.
David W. Mockbee, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie & Sims, Jackson, Miss., argued for appellee.
Before RICH, SMITH, and NIES, Circuit Judges.
NIES, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the final judgment of the United States Claims Court, reported at 8 Cl.Ct. 490 (1985), awarding Fortec Constructors delay damages, an extension of contract time, interest, and costs. We affirm.
OPINION
Upon consideration of each of the government's arguments, we conclude that the government has failed to establish any error in the court's analysis. Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Judge Yock's opinion.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
804 F.2d 141, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 20381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fortec-constructors-etc-v-the-united-states-cafc-1986.