Forte v. McNellis

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 26, 2023·No. 1:16-cv-00560·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANIELFORTE, SO*™~=~CS~S Plaintiff, 16 CIVIL 0560 (VSB) -against- JUDGMENT THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al. Defendants. eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 26, 2023, the motions for summary judgment of the NY Defendants and the WP Defendants are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 26, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: CR Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forte v. McNellis, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Forte v. McNellis (Forte v. McNellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)