Forte v. McNellis
This text of Forte v. McNellis (Forte v. McNellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DANIELFORTE, SO*™~=~CS~S Plaintiff, 16 CIVIL 0560 (VSB) -against- JUDGMENT THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al. Defendants. eK
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 26, 2023, the motions for summary judgment of the NY Defendants and the WP Defendants are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York September 26, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: CR Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Forte v. McNellis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forte-v-mcnellis-nysd-2023.