Forsythe v. Norcross

5 Watts 432
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

An entry on a card or a slate, is but a memorandum preparatory to permanent evidence of the transaction, which must be perfected at or near the time, and in the routine of the business. But the routine must be a reasonable one; for there is nothing in the condition of a craftsman to call for indulgence till his slate be full, or till it be convenient for him to dispose of the ■contents of it. In Ingraham v. Bockius, 9 Serg. & Rawle 285, and Patton v. Ryan, 4 Rawle 410, the entries were transferred the same evening or the next morning; and they ought in every instance to [433]*433be so in the course of the succeeding day. In Vicary v. Moore, 2 Watts 458, entries transferred from scraps of paper carried about in the pocket during one or more days, were held to be inadmissible; and on this principle, the book was, in the present instance, incompetent.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forsythe v. Norcross, 5 Watts 432 (Pa. 1836).

5 Watts 432 (Forsythe v. Norcross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silver v. Worcester
72 Me. 322 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1881)
Gaines v. Relf
53 U.S. 472 (Supreme Court, 1852)
Cook v. Ashmead
2 Miles 268 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1838)
Smith v. Sanford
29 Mass. 139 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1832)