Forrester v. Denny
This text of 157 S.E. 481 (Forrester v. Denny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Plaintiff brought suit against defendants for injunction and rescission of a contract for the purchase of land with part of the purchase-money paid, and for restitution, based on alleged fraud in the procurement of the contract by representations on the part of the defendants that they had title to the land. Held:
1. The court did not err in rejecting testimony as to declarations made by Denny, the defendant, to Forrester, the plaintiff, Denny being dead.
2. There is no evidence in the record as to any representations made to plaintiff, by defendants as to the title to this property; and the verdict for defendants was demanded. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. See Black v. Walker, 98 Ga. 31 (26 S. E. 477).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E. 481, 172 Ga. 309, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrester-v-denny-ga-1931.