Forrester v. Denny

157 S.E. 481, 172 Ga. 309, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 80
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 20, 1931
DocketNo. 7906
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 481 (Forrester v. Denny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forrester v. Denny, 157 S.E. 481, 172 Ga. 309, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 80 (Ga. 1931).

Opinions

Hill, J.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendants for injunction and rescission of a contract for the purchase of land with part of the purchase-money paid, and for restitution, based on alleged fraud in the procurement of the contract by representations on the part of the defendants that they had title to the land. Held:

1. The court did not err in rejecting testimony as to declarations made by Denny, the defendant, to Forrester, the plaintiff, Denny being dead.

[310]*310No. 7906. February 20, 1931. Rehearing denied February 28, 1931. G. A. Christian, for plaintiff. Wright & Covington, for defendants.

2. There is no evidence in the record as to any representations made to plaintiff, by defendants as to the title to this property; and the verdict for defendants was demanded. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial. See Black v. Walker, 98 Ga. 31 (26 S. E. 477).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoncwr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crowell v. Brim
12 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Cummings v. Adams
10 S.E.2d 106 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 481, 172 Ga. 309, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forrester-v-denny-ga-1931.