Black v. Walker

26 S.E. 477, 98 Ga. 31
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 2, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 26 S.E. 477 (Black v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Black v. Walker, 26 S.E. 477, 98 Ga. 31 (Ga. 1895).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. The maker of promissory notes given for the purchase of land of which such maker holds undisturbed possession under a bond from the vendor, conditioned to make to the former a good and sufficient title to the land upon payment of the notes, can neither voluntarily rescind the contract of purchase nor defeat the collection of the notes, upon the ground that the vendor has not in fact a good title to the land in question, without showing clearly that there is a paramount outstanding title against the vendor, and also proving fraud upon his part, or that he is insolvent, or a non-resident, or else proving other facts which would authorize equitable interference with the carrying out of the contract as made.

2. There being in the present case no proof whatever of fraud or insolvency on the part of the plaintiffs, who. were the defendant’s vendors, and the defendant, irrespective of the question whether or not a paramount outstanding title against' the plaintiffs was shown, having in other respects entirely failed take the case out of the rule of law announced in the preceding note, there was no error in directing a verdict for the plaintiffs. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Middleton v. Pruden
14 S.E.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Crowell v. Brim
12 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Early v. Conn
10 S.E.2d 177 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Campbell v. Gormley
192 S.E. 430 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Pruden v. Middleton
186 S.E. 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Archibald Hardware Co. v. Gifford
163 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Forrester v. Denny
157 S.E. 481 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Maisler v. Etheridge
146 S.E. 648 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Bank of Bullochville v. Riehle
137 S.E. 642 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Puckett v. Jones
136 S.E. 462 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Forsyth Mercantile Co. v. Williams
135 S.E. 755 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Beasley v. Burton
124 S.E. 368 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Joiner v. Southern Land Sales Corp.
124 S.E. 518 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Reid v. McCune
116 S.E. 554 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Reeves v. Lasseter
115 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Newton v. Bowen
91 S.E. 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Henderson v. Fields
85 S.E. 741 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Sperry v. Planters Rice Mill Co.
84 S.E. 492 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Kennedy v. Smith
82 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Gould v. Small
49 S.E. 723 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E. 477, 98 Ga. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/black-v-walker-ga-1895.