Fornix Holdings LLC v. Unknown Party
Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Fornix Holdings LLC, et al., No. CV-25-01818-PHX-KML
10 Plaintiffs, ORDER
11 v.
12 Unknown Party,
13 Defendant. 14 15 Plaintiff Fornix Holdings LLC owns the copyrights on hundreds of works it licenses 16 to plaintiff CP Productions. CP Productions “owns and runs” a subscriber-based website 17 where the copyrighted works are available. (Doc. 1 at 3.) Plaintiffs seek permission to 18 complete alternative service on the unknown individual plaintiffs believe is responsible for 19 unauthorized distribution of the copyrighted works. 20 Plaintiffs allege a website found at pleasurepixel.com—a domain name owned and 21 operated by John Doe—is distributing free copies of plaintiffs’ copyrighted works. (Doc. 22 1 at 8.) By making plaintiffs’ works “available for free streaming,” John Doe diverts users 23 from paying to access plaintiffs’ works. (Doc. 1 at 8.) The registrant information for 24 pleasurepixel.com is redacted except “the ‘registrant state/province’ is provided as ‘North 25 Holland,’ a province of the Netherlands.” (Doc. 10-1 at 2.) 26 In May 2025, plaintiffs filed their complaint asserting a single claim for copyright 27 infringement against John Doe. (Doc. 1). On July 31, 2025, an employee of the firm 28 representing plaintiffs sent an email to contact@pleasurepixel.com and requested a 1 “physical address so service could be properly effectuated.” (Doc. 10-1 at 3.) Two days 2 later, a response was received identifying an address in the Netherlands. (Doc. 10-1 at 3.) 3 Plaintiffs sent the summons and complaint to that address via FedEx and the United States 4 Postal Service. Counsel then received an email stating the physical address was for a “small 5 datacenter” and the operators there had “no idea who owns the site Pleasurepixel.com.” 6 (Doc. 10-1 at 3.) Plaintiffs’ counsel emailed a company that provides services to 7 pleasurepixel.com and asked for a physical address of the site’s operator, but that email 8 was not answered. (Doc. 10-1 at 4.) 9 Despite efforts to uncover John Doe’s address, plaintiffs have not been successful. 10 Plaintiffs appear to argue the only information they have is that John Doe is located 11 somewhere in the Netherlands and therefore request permission to serve John Doe via 12 email to contact@pleasurepixel.com. (Doc. 10-3 at 7.) 13 “Rule 4(f)(3) permits service in a place not within any judicial district of the United 14 States ‘by . . . means not prohibited by international agreement as may be directed by the 15 court.’” Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Int’l Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002). 16 Service of process under this rule “is neither a ‘last resort’ nor ‘extraordinary relief’” but 17 “merely one means among several which enables service of process on an international 18 defendant.” Id. at 1015. A district court may authorize this form of alternative service if 19 the plaintiffs “demonstrate that the facts and circumstances . . . necessitate[]” such relief. 20 Id. at 1016. 21 The United States and the Netherlands are both parties to the Hague Service 22 Convention. (Doc. 10-3 at 6.) But “Article 1 of the Hague Service Convention states that 23 it does not apply ‘where the address of the person to be served with the document is not 24 known.’” (Doc. 10-3 at 6.) Plaintiffs do not know John Doe’s address and there does not 25 appear to be any method for plaintiffs to learn that address. An email sent to 26 contact@pleasurepixel.com received a response, indicating that email address is 27 monitored. In these circumstances, service via email will provide adequate notice of this 28 suit. 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED the Motion (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. Within five days of this || order plaintiffs shall serve the Summons and Complaint in this action on defendant via email to contact @pleasurepixel.com and file proof of service on the docket. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED if no response to the complaint is made by the || applicable deadline, plaintiffs shall apply for entry of default no later than ten days after expiration of the deadline. Plaintiffs shall apply for default judgment within ten days of 8 || default being entered. 9 Dated this 18th day of August, 2025. 10 i “/ {ff Vo ’ Vy f \ G. / ,
Honorable Krissa M. Lanham 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fornix Holdings LLC v. Unknown Party (Fornix Holdings LLC v. Unknown Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.