Forman v. Fink ex rel. Fink

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Forman v. Fink ex rel. Fink

646 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353, 1994 WL 583944

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 1994

DocketNos. 93-2606, 93-2613

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 646 So. 2d 236 (Forman v. Fink ex rel. Fink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Forman v. Fink ex rel. Fink, 646 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353, 1994 WL 583944 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated ease, petitioner, Lawrence Forman, a certified rehabilitation administrator, seeks review of that portion of [237]*237a trial court order compelling discovery of all medical and legal evaluations petitioner conducted from 1990 through 1993, and evidence of income received on matters in which he was retained by an attorney during those years. We grant the petition and quash this portion of the order on the authority of Syken v. Elkins, 644 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (en banc).

Petitioner, Malka Fink, seeks review of another portion of the order compelling “full and complete discovery from Plaintiffs’ former medical expert Joan Pehta, M.D.,” an expert witness who had been withdrawn by petitioner. Because no exceptional circumstances were shown to compel discovery of an expert not expected to testify at trial, we grant the petition and quash this part of the trial court’s order. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(4)(B); Lift Systems, Inc. v. Costo Wholesale Corp., 636 So.2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Morgan v. Tracy, 604 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Gilmor Trading Corp. v. Lind Elec., Inc., 555 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ruiz ex rel. Ruiz v. Brea, 489 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (opinion on rehearing).

Petitions for writ of certiorari granted; order quashed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated ease, petitioner, Lawrence Forman, a certified rehabilitation administrator, seeks review of that portion of [237]*237a trial court order compelling discovery of all medical and legal evaluations petitioner conducted from 1990 through 1993, and evidence of income received on matters in which he was retained by an attorney during those years. We grant the petition and quash this portion of the order on the authority of Syken v. Elkins, 644 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (en banc).

Petitioner, Malka Fink, seeks review of another portion of the order compelling “full and complete discovery from Plaintiffs’ former medical expert Joan Pehta, M.D.,” an expert witness who had been withdrawn by petitioner. Because no exceptional circumstances were shown to compel discovery of an expert not expected to testify at trial, we grant the petition and quash this part of the trial court’s order. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(4)(B); Lift Systems, Inc. v. Costo Wholesale Corp., 636 So.2d 569 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Morgan v. Tracy, 604 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Gilmor Trading Corp. v. Lind Elec., Inc., 555 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ruiz ex rel. Ruiz v. Brea, 489 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (opinion on rehearing).

Petitions for writ of certiorari granted; order quashed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 So. 2d 236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10353, 1994 WL 583944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forman-v-fink-ex-rel-fink-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack