Chung v. Fink
672 So. 2d 34, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 167, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 597, 1996 WL 169066
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1996
DocketNos. 85053, 85117
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 672 So. 2d 34 (Chung v. Fink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chung v. Fink, 672 So. 2d 34, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 167, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 597, 1996 WL 169066 (Fla. 1996).
Opinion
We have for review Forman v. Fink, 646 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), which concerns the appropriate scope of discovery necessary to impeach the testimony of an opponent’s expert medical witness.1 We addressed this same issue in Elkins v. Syken, 672 So.2d 517 (Fla.1996). In accordance with our decision in Elkins, we approve the decision of the district court in the instant case.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scales v. Swill
715 So. 2d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
672 So. 2d 34, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 167, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 597, 1996 WL 169066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chung-v-fink-fla-1996.