Forester-Hoare v. Roper
This text of Forester-Hoare v. Roper (Forester-Hoare v. Roper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
SEAN FORESTER-HOARE,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-137-JPS v.
C.O. ROPER, SGT. BEAHM, CPT. TRITT, SERGEANT FALKE, BRIAN FOSTER, ORDER WARDEN HEPP, DR. NELSON, DR. MANLOVE, ACP MOORE, HSU MANAGER MELI, PAUL BEKX, MICHAEL RIVERS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE, KEVIN CARR, DR. WHITE, DR. ANDERSON, and DOES 1-3,
Defendants.
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-193-JPS v.
SGT. BEAHM, CPT. TRITT, SECURITY ORDER DIRECTOR FALKE, WARDEN FOSTER, WARDEN HEPP, DR. NELSON, ACP MOORE, HSU MANAGER MELI, PAUL BEKX, MICHAEL RIVERS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE, KEVIN CARR, DR. ANDERS, DR. KALLAS, DR. WHITE, and JOHN DOES,
Defendants. SEAN FORESTER-HOARE,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-386-JPS-JPS v.
C.O. ROPER, SGT. BEAHM, C.O. BUBLITZ, ORDER LT. BIRDISHAW, LT. STANNICK, LT. BURNS, CPT. TRITT, SECURITY DIRECTOR FALKE, WARDEN FOSTER, WARDEN HEPP, ACP MOORE, HSU MANAGER MELI, PAUL BEKX, MICHAEL RIVERS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE, KEVIN CARR, DR. NELSON, DR. WHITE, DR. ANDERS, DR. KALLAS, and JOHN/JANE DOES,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-415-JPS-JPS v.
C.O. ROPER, SGT. BEAHM, CPT. TRITT, ORDER SECURITY DIRECTOR FALKE, WARDEN FOSTER, WARDEN HEPP, ACP MOORE, HSU MANAGER MELI, PAUL BEKX, MICHAEL RIVERS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE, KEVIN CARR, DR. WHITE, DR. KALLAS, DR. ANDERS, JOHN/JANE DOES, CPS KUEPPER, and DR. NELSON,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-537-JPS v.
SECURITY DIRECTOR KIND, CPT. CUSHING, ORDER CPT. SWIEKATOWSKI, DEPUTY WARDEN HAESE, WARDEN RADTKE, SGT. PAGEL, SGT. WASIELEWSKI, LT. KENT, LT. ROZMARYNOWSKI, LT. WICKMAN, LT. MEJIA, CPT. EISINGER, CAPT. VAN LANEN, CPT. COLE, CPT. SCHULTZ, CPS PERTTU, CPS HOFFMAN, DAI ADMINISTRATOR HOVE, WARDEN COOPER, MIAREEN WOOD, DOC SECRETARY CARR, ICE DEGROOT, ICE GRABOWSKI, ICE DAVIDSON, ICE HOMPE, ICE ODONNELL, PAULA STESEL, HANNAH UTER, MS. WERTEL, MS. ITEIL, DR. HAMILTON, DR. PYRENBERG, H. BERG, RN MATUSHAK, MS. VOGELS, MR. DORSEY, ANGELA HANSEN, SANDRA DEYOUNG, M. SCHORNACK, J. KOEHLER, K JOHNSON DEBAUCHE, and LT. MATUSHALR,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-686-JPS-JPS v.
MARY MOORE, HSU MANAGERMELI, DR. ORDER MANLOVE, DR. ANDERSON, PAUL BEKX, MICHAEL RIVERS, LT. BURNS, V. REISEN, WARDEN FOSTER, WARDEN HEPP, MAKDA FESSAHAYE, KEVIN CARR, C.O. ODONNELL, and JOHN DOES,
Plaintiff, Case No. 23-CV-727-JPS-JPS v.
SGT. BEAHM, CPT. TRITT, SERGEANT ORDER FALKE, WARDEN FOSTER, WARDEN HEPP, ACP MOORE, HSU MANAGER MELI, PAUL BEKX, MICHAEL RIVERS, MAKDA FESSAHAYE, KEVIN CARR, DR. WHITE, DR. KALLAS, DR. ANDERS, DR. NELSON, and JOHN DOES,
Plaintiff Sean Forester-Hoare (“Forester-Hoare”), an inmate at Green Bay Correctional Institution, has filed seven cases within the last four months. All of Plaintiff’s cases are § 1983 civil rights cases and are generally brought against the same group of defendants with some exceptions. Specifically, Plaintiff has filed the following cases: Date Filed Case Number Disposition 2/2/2023 23-CV-137 Pending 2/10/2023 23-CV-193 Pending 3/24/2023 23-CV-386 Pending 3/29/2023 23-CV-415 Pending 4/27/2023 23-CV-537 Pending 6/2/2023 23-CV-686 Pending 6/7/2023 23-CV-727 Pending The right of access to federal courts is not absolute. In re Chapman, 328 F.3d 903, 905 (7th Cir. 2003) (citing United States ex rel. Verdone v. Circuit Court for Taylor Cnty., 73 F.3d 669, 674 (7th Cir. 1995)). Individuals are “only entitled to meaningful access to the courts.” Id. (citing Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351 (1996)). “Every paper filed . . . no matter how repetitious or frivolous, requires some portion of the institution’s limited resources. A part of the Court’s responsibility is to see that these resources are allocated in a way that promotes the interests of justice.” In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 184 (1989). A federal court’s inherent powers include “the ability to fashion an appropriate sanction for conduct which abuses the judicial process.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44–45 (1991). The All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), gives district courts the “inherent power to enter pre-filing orders against vexatious litigants.” Orlando Residence Ltd. v. GP Credit Co., LLC, 609 F. Supp. 2d 813, 816–17 (E.D. Wis. 2009) (citing Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1057 (9th Cir. 2007)). “A filing restriction must, however, be narrowly tailored to the type of abuse, and must not bar the courthouse door absolutely.” Chapman v. Exec. Comm., 324 Fed. App’x 500, 502 (7th Cir. 2009) (citations omitted). “Courts have consistently approved filing bars that permit litigants access if they cease their abusive filing practices,” but have “rejected as overbroad filing bars in perpetuity.” Id. (citations omitted); Smith v. United States Cong., No. 19-CV-1001-PP, 2019 WL 6037487, at *9 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 14, 2019). Under the circumstances presented by Plaintiff having filed seven cases within four months, the Court finds it appropriate to impose a filing bar limiting Plaintiff to proceeding with only two cases before this branch of the Court at any one time. Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to file a letter with the Court within thirty days of this Order indicating which two of his seven open cases (23-CV-137, 23-CV-193, 23-CV-386, 23-CV-415, 23-CV-537, 23-CV-686, 23-CV-727) he would like to proceed. The remaining five cases will then be administratively closed subject to a motion to reopen after such time as the number of Plaintiff’s pending cases falls below two. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Sean Forester-Hoare is BARRED from filing any new civil cases in this district until such time as the number of Forester-Hoare’s pending cases is reduced to two before this branch of the Court; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with the terms of this Order, Plaintiff must file a letter with the Court on or before July 10, 2023 indicating which two of his seven open cases before this Court (23-CV-137, 23-CV-193, 23-CV-386, 23-CV-415, 23-CV-537, 23-CV-686, 23-CV-727) he would like to proceed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, consistent with the terms of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall return any new case filings received from, or on behalf of, Sean Forester-Hoare, back to him unfiled, together with a copy of this Order. Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 9th day of June, 2023. vn Wek sas) PUY fea , J. R. Stach ueller U.SNDistrict Judge
Page 6 of 6
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Forester-Hoare v. Roper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forester-hoare-v-roper-wied-2023.