Forest Prods. Chem. Co. v. Commissioner

27 B.T.A. 638, 1933 BTA LEXIS 1340
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 1933
DocketDocket No. 46621.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 B.T.A. 638 (Forest Prods. Chem. Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forest Prods. Chem. Co. v. Commissioner, 27 B.T.A. 638, 1933 BTA LEXIS 1340 (bta 1933).

Opinion

[640]*640OPINION.

Lansdon:

The petitioner’s contention that for the year 1927 it was entitled to file a consolidated return for itself and a 100 per cent owned subsidiary is without merit. Affiliation after May 14, 1926, is admitted by the respondent, but the record shows that for that year each of the affiliated corporations filed a separate income tax return. That procedure was an election to file separate returns as provided in section 240 (c) of the Revenue Act of 19261 and article 632 of Regulations 69.2 Petitioner’s sole contention on this issue is that through conversations between one of its employees and a revenue agent it satisfied the requirements of the statute and the regulations. This is not sufficient. The Commissioner was never asked to grant the necessary permission to change to the consolidated basis, nor did he even delegate his discretion or authority to the revenue agent. On this issue the determination of the respondent is affirmed. [641]*641Lucas v. St. Louis National Base Ball Club, 42 Fed. (2d) 984; certiorari denied, 282 U. S. 283; A. S. Siracusa Sons, Inc., 23 B. T. A. 53. Cf. Gustave Rader Co., 19 B. T. A. 12; L. V. Estes, Inc., 22 B. T. A. 806; M. Morgenthau-Seixas Co., 25 B. T. A. 1235.

On the second question it is clear that in the taxable year the petitioner spent the amount of $4,236.82 in an investigation of the Suide method of manufacturing acetic acid. It is equally clear that in subsequent years it erected a plant for the use of that method and that it eventually secured a license from the patentee of such method, permitting its use during the life of the patent. The cost of this investigation, of the plant additions and any other expenses incurred in securing such license and in the installation of machinery and equipment for the production of acetic acid were all capital expenditures which we think are deductible ratably from income during the

term of the license. Gillianrb Mfg. Co., 1 B. T. A. 967; Goodell-Pratt Co., 3 B. T. A. 30; Dempster Mill Mfg. Co. v. Burnet, 46 Fed. (2d) 604; United Profit-Sharing Gorp., 66 Ct. Cls. 171. We are of the opinion that this amount was properly accounted for on the books of the petitioner as deferred charges and that it is not deductible from income in the taxable year, as is now contended.

Upon the record we are convinced that the bonus credits of $500 and $5,000 made to Albin and Boisen in the taxable year were duly authorized and were corporate obligations at December 31 of such year. The officer authorized to make the contracts with the employees ordered the credits. The total amount received by each employee was reasonable compensation for services rendered in 1927. The fact that the stock certificates were not issued until some time in 1928 is not material, since the petitioner was on the accrual basis. Moreover, the credit made as of December 31,1927, vested the ownership of the specified amount of common stock in the employees as of that date, regardless of the time at which the certificates, which are no more than evidence of stock ownership, were issued. The uncon-tradicted evidence indicates that the stock was worth $100 per share when the credits were made. On this issue the determination of the respondent is reversed.

Decision will be entered under Bute 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kent Mach. Co. v. Commissioner
6 T.C.M. 441 (U.S. Tax Court, 1947)
Forest Prods. Chem. Co. v. Commissioner
27 B.T.A. 638 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 B.T.A. 638, 1933 BTA LEXIS 1340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forest-prods-chem-co-v-commissioner-bta-1933.