Foremost Life Insurance Co. v. Langdon

633 P.2d 938, 1981 Wyo. LEXIS 371
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 1981
Docket5488, 5489
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 633 P.2d 938 (Foremost Life Insurance Co. v. Langdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Foremost Life Insurance Co. v. Langdon, 633 P.2d 938, 1981 Wyo. LEXIS 371 (Wyo. 1981).

Opinions

BROWN, Justice.

[939]*939Appellants appeal from the district court’s order affirming the Wyoming Insurance Commissioner’s disapproval of the rates and forms submitted under Chapter 21 for credit life and disability insurance written for terms of five years or longer. We agree with the district court and will affirm.

The following issues have been raised on appeal:1

1. Does Chapter 21 of the Wyoming Insurance Code prohibit the sale of credit life and credit disability insurance for terms exceeding five years?

2. If Chapter 21 of the Wyoming Insurance Code does not prohibit the sale of credit life and credit disability insurance for terms exceeding five years, may insurance designated as such be written using rates and forms approved under Chapter 21 of the Wyoming Insurance Code for periods of five years or longer because Article 4 of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code supplements and expands Chapter 21 of the Wyoming Insurance Code?

3. Are the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order issued by the Insurance Commissioner insufficient as a matter of law?

In September of 1978, the Wyoming Insurance Department approved the rates and policy forms submitted by appellant U.S. Life Credit Life Insurance Company for the sale of credit life and disability insurance for terms exceeding 59 months. By letter dated April 9,1979, the Wyoming Insurance Department withdrew its approval of these rates and policy forms.

Appellant Foremost Life Insurance Company had also been writing credit life insurance policies for terms exceeding 59 months. In April of 1980, the Wyoming Insurance Department issued a notice and order to show cause challenging Foremost’s sale of credit life insurance for terms exceeding 59 months.

After considerable legal jousting, Foremost, U.S. Life and the Wyoming Insurance Department stipulated to the facts and the issues2 that were before the Wyoming Insurance Commissioner, thus eliminating the need for a hearing. In his Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Decision and Order, the Insurance Commissioner withdrew the previous approval of appellants’ rates and policy forms for credit life and disability insurance issued for terms exceeding 59 months.

The Insurance Commissioner concluded that the use of any rate or form styled to be “credit life insurance” or “credit disability insurance” may no longer be written for a term of five or more years.3 We interpret the phrase “styled to be” as having a dual meaning: credit insurance that complies with the requirements set forth in Chapter 21 and also credit insurance that is called “credit life insurance” or “credit disability insurance.” 4

Appellants then filed a petition for review in the district court. After reviewing the file and the briefs of the parties, the [940]*940district court judge entered an order affirming the Wyoming Insurance Commissioner’s order. Appellants • are appealing from the district court’s order.

I

The first question we must address is whether Chapter 21 prohibits the sale of credit life and disability insurance for terms in excess of 59 months. The pertinent statute, Section 26-21-101, W.S.1977, Chapter 21, Wyoming Insurance Code, provides in part:

“All life insurance and all disability insurance in connection with loans or other credit transactions shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter; except, that insurance in connection with a loan or other credit transaction of five (5) years duration or more shall not be subject to this chapter * * (Emphasis added.)

The language of the statute is clear and unambiguous; therefore, “we will not look to statutory rules of construction, nor will we attribute another meaning to the statute.” Matter of Estate of Reno, Wyo., 604 P.2d 550, 553 (1979). The statute does not prohibit the sale of credit insurance for terms of five years or longer, but rather provides that such insurance is not subject to Chapter 21 of the Wyoming Insurance Code.

II

Because Chapter 21 does not prohibit credit insurance written for terms of five years or longer, the next question is whether rates and forms approved under Chapter 21 can be used to write insurance for terms of five years or longer. After reviewing § 26-21-101, W.S.1977, the Insurance Commissioner stated in his conclusions of law:

“The statute is crystal clear: Such insurance for terms of five or more years is not subject to Chapter 21. Hence, the definitions found in W.S. § 26-21-102(a)(i) and (ii) are not applicable to insurance for terms of five or more years * * * ft

As a general rule, courts give deference to the interpretation of a statute by the officers or the agency charged with the administration of the statute. Demos v. Board of County Commissioners of Natrona County, Wyo., 571 P.2d 980 (1977); County of Natrona v. Casper Air Service, Wyo., 536 P.2d 142 (1975); Kearney Lake, Land & Reservoir Company v. Lake DeSmet Reservoir Company, Wyo., 487 P.2d 324 (1971); and State ex rel. Goshen Irr. Dist. v. Hunt, 49 Wyo. 497, 57 P.2d 793 (1936). We agree with the Insurance Commissioner’s interpretation of § 26-21-101, W.S.1977.

When the word “shall” is used by the legislature in a statute, courts interpret the statute as mandatory unless the context indicates a contrary legislative intent. Mayland v. State, Wyo., 568 P.2d 897, 899 (1977). Because § 26-21-101, W.S.1977, specifically provides that credit life and disability insurance written for terms of five years or longer “shall not be subject to this chapter,” it is obvious that the legislature was setting forth a mandatory rule.

Such statutory interpretation has been accepted by the Arizona court in Foremost Life Insurance Company v. Trimble, 119 Ariz. 222, 580 P.2d 360, 364 (1978), where the court interpreted a statute very similar to § 26-21-101, W.S.1977,5 to determine whether

“ * * * the essence of the Director’s argument * * * that Article 10 prohibits credit life and disability insurance in excess of ten years duration only in the sense that an issuer of insurance of such duration is prohibited from claiming the benefits * * * set forth in Article 10 * * * M

was correct. In upholding the Director’s position, the court stated:

[941]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
776 P.2d 181 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1989)
FMC v. Lane
773 P.2d 163 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1989)
Campbell County v. Wyoming Community College Commission
731 P.2d 1174 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1987)
Harris v. Wyoming State Tax Commission
718 P.2d 49 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1986)
Foremost Life Insurance Co. v. Langdon
633 P.2d 938 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
633 P.2d 938, 1981 Wyo. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foremost-life-insurance-co-v-langdon-wyo-1981.