Foremost Insurance Co. v. Barrett
This text of 441 So. 2d 179 (Foremost Insurance Co. v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directed to Respondent trial judge to require the trial court to give the parties adequate notice of the trial date as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1440(c).
We “requested” responses from any and all parties. Having received a response only from the defendant in the trial court which agreed with petitioner that the notice was inadequate and prejudiced the parties, we grant the Writ of Mandamus and direct the trial court to furnish notice of trial to the parties in accordance with the referenced rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 So. 2d 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foremost-insurance-co-v-barrett-fladistctapp-1983.