Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Weissing
This text of 448 So. 2d 630 (Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Weissing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Foremost Insurance Co. v. Barkett, 441 So.2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), we granted a writ of mandamus because of an inadequate notice of trial which prejudiced the parties. In the case at bar, the petitioner/ defendant received no notice of trial. See Rule 1.440(b) and (c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, we grant the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to strike the cause from the April 23rd trial calendar. The matter may be reset within a reasonable period of time and after proper notice in compliance with the rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 So. 2d 630, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firemans-fund-insurance-co-v-weissing-fladistctapp-1984.