Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Weissing

448 So. 2d 630, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12760
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1984·No. No. 84-811·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Foremost Insurance Co. v. Barkett, 441 So.2d 179 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), we granted a writ of mandamus because of an inadequate notice of trial which prejudiced the parties. In the case at bar, the petitioner/ defendant received no notice of trial. See Rule 1.440(b) and (c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, we grant the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to strike the cause from the April 23rd trial calendar. The matter may be reset within a reasonable period of time and after proper notice in compliance with the rule.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Weissing, 448 So. 2d 630, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12760 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

448 So. 2d 630 (Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Weissing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea
170 So. 3d 125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Genuine Parts Co. v. Parsons
917 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)