Ford v. State
742 S.E.2d 148, 321 Ga. App. 632, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1428, 2013 WL 1732542, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 356
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 312 Ga. App. 80 →
Opinion
Kwambi Ford filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss his indictment based upon an alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The Supreme Court of Georgia has recently ruled, however, that such a claim is not directly appealable and that a defendant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).
Appeal dismissed.
Sosniak v. State, 292 Ga. 35, 36 (2) (734 SE2d 362) (2012); Morris v. State, 319 Ga. App. 198 (734 SE2d 926) (2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. State, 742 S.E.2d 148, 321 Ga. App. 632, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1428, 2013 WL 1732542, 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 356 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).
742 S.E.2d 148 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sosniak v. State
734 S.E.2d 362 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Stevens v. State
734 S.E.2d 743 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
Morris v. State
734 S.E.2d 926 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)