Ford v. State
132 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 197, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 626
This text of 132 S.E. 272 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ford v. State, 132 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 197, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 626 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Ford was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The
evidence, while raising a strong suspicion of the defendant’s guilt, was not, in our opinion, sufficient to authorize his conviction. For this reason the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
132 S.E. 272, 35 Ga. App. 197, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-gactapp-1926.